Search
SOCIAL INFRASTRUCTURE

Access to Utilities and Household facilities.

 Main source of lighting of dwelling unit

Table 8.8 shows the main source of lighting of dwelling unit by type of locality. The main source of lighting for most households (48.9%) is kerosene lamp. A higher proportion of households using kerosene lamp as their main source of light is higher in rural (62.4%) than urban areas (29.3%) Out of the urban households in the District, 57.8 percent use electricity with 19.7 percent in rural areas also using electricity as their main source of lighting.

Table 8.8: Main source of lighting of dwelling unit by type of locality

Main source of light

Total country

Region

District

Total

Number

Percent

Urban

Rural

Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

Electricity (mains)

3,511,065

245,583

6,549

35.3

57.8

19.7

Electricity (private generator)

36,142

3,923

165

0.9

0.9

0.9

Kerosene lamp

971,807

200,064

9,084

48.9

29.3

62.4

Gas lamp

9,378

799

52

0.3

0.2

0.3

Solar energy

9,194

783

21

0.1

0.1

0.1

Candle

41,214

2,239

91

0.5

0.6

0.4

Flashlight/Torch

858,651

39,881

2,483

13.4

10.8

15.2

Firewood

13,241

1,474

93

0.5

0.1

0.8

Crop residue

4,623

425

18

0.1

0.1

0.1

Other

11,739

429

21

0.1

0.2

0.1

 

 

 Main source of cooking fuel, and cooking space used by households

The main source of cooking fuel in the District is wood (11,024) representing 59.3 percent of households whiles charcoal (6,131) constituting 33 percent is the second highest. This shows a clear indication of the level of pressure on the District’s forest reserves.

In terms of locality of residence, a higher proportion of households in the rural areas representing 80.4 percent use wood as compared to 19.6 percent households living in urban areas. Majority of households living in urban areas use more charcoal constituting 60.3 percent than those living in rural areas (14.2%).

The main source of cooking space used by households also shows that a higher proportion of the households use a Separate room for exclusive use representing 40.5 percent for domestic activities with urban and rural proportions of 32.9 percent and 45.7 percent respectively. Open space in compounds (23.4%)) is the next commonest cooking space used by households with urban and rural proportions of (28.8%) and (19.6%) households respectively.

Main source of cooking fuel, and cooking space used by households

District

Source of cooking fuel/cooking space

Total country

Region

Total

Urban

Rural

Number

Percent

Main source of cooking fuel for household

Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

None no cooking

306,118

12,888

408

2.2

2.0

2.3

Wood

2,197,083

283,048

11,024

59.3

28.8

80.4

Gas

996,518

46,084

771

4.2

7.6

1.8

Electricity

29,794

972

30

0.2

0.3

0.1

Kerosene

29,868

2,512

97

0.5

0.7

0.4

Charcoal

1,844,290

146,677

6,131

33.0

60.3

14.2

Crop residue

45,292

2,419

91

0.5

0.2

0.7

Saw dust

8,000

389

9

0.0

0.1

0.0

Animal waste

2,332

104

2

0.0

0.0

0.0

Other

7,759

507

14

0.1

0.1

0.1



Cooking space used by household


Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

No cooking space

386,883

21,127

865

4.7

2.8

6.0

Separate room for exclusive use of household

1,817,018

173,544

7,523

40.5

32.9

45.7

Separate room shared with other household(s)

410,765

17,362

849

4.6

3.8

5.1

Enclosure without roof

117,614

9,352

263

1.4

1.1

1.7

Structure with roof but without walls

349,832

97,942

1,983

10.7

6.9

13.3

Bedroom/Hall/Living room)

74,525

17,049

372

2.0

3.2

1.2

Verandah

1,173,946

51,288

2,336

12.6

20.6

7.0

Open space in compound

1,115,464

106,104

4,339

23.4

28.8

19.6

Other

21,007

1,832

47

0.3

0.1

0.3

 Main Source of Water for Drinking and for other Domestic use

The data revealed that about one-third (34.2%) of households in the District use the river/stream as their main source of drinking water. However, 44.6 percent of households in the rural areas use river/stream as their main source of drinking water as compared to 19.2 percent in urban areas of The District. Also, 16.3 percent of households in the District use public tap/standpipes as their main source of drinking water whilst 14.7 percent use pipe 52

borne water outside the dwelling. Only 10.0 percent of households use pipe borne water inside the dwelling for drinking.

As shown in Table 8.10, 38.3 percent of households use the river/stream as their main source of water for other domestic use. In rural areas the figure is 48.4 percent and in urban 23.6 percent. Also, 14.2 percent use pipe borne water outside the dwelling for domestic use. Only 10.2 percent of households use pipe borne water inside the dwelling for other domestic use. As indicated in Table 8.10, more than half (55.2%) of households living in the urban areas of The District have access to

pipe borne water whilst only 23.7 percent have access in the rural areas for domestic use.


 Main source of water of dwelling unit for drinking and other

domestic purposes

Sources of water

Total country

Region

District

Total

Number

Percent

Urban

Rural

Main source of drinking water for household

Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

Pipe-borne inside dwelling

790,493

36,536

1,857

10.0

21.1

2.4

Pipe-borne outside dwelling

1,039,667

93,019

2,731

14.7

26.6

6.5

Public tap/Standpipe

712,375

95,209

3,022

16.3

12.2

19.1

Bore-hole/Pump/Tube well

1,267,688

81,286

1,240

6.7

2.1

9.8

Protected well

321,091

22,577

978

5.3

12.5

0.3

Rain water

39,438

15,627

70

0.4

0.1

0.6

Protected spring

19,345

1,626

36

0.2

0.1

0.2

Bottled water

20,261

761

17

0.1

0.1

0.1

Satchet water

490,283

16,196

329

1.8

3.4

0.7

Tanker supply/Vendor provided

58,400

2,120

8

0.0

0.0

0.1

Unprotected well

112,567

24,012

477

2.6

2.5

2.6

Unprotected spring

12,222

2,677

349

1.9

0.1

3.1

River/Stream

502,804

81,663

6,359

34.2

19.2

44.6

Dugout/Pond/Lake/Dam/Canal

76,448

21,897

1,103

5.9

0.0

10.0

Other

3,972

394

1

0.0

0.0

0.0

Main source of water for other domestic use of household



Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

Pipe-borne inside dwelling

905,566

36,186

1,887

10.2

20.9

2.8

Pipe-borne outside dwelling

1,089,030

74,062

2,641

14.2

25.5

6.5

Public tap/Standpipe

704,293

83,508

2,251

12.1

8.8

14.4

Bore-hole/Pump/Tube well

1,280,465

73,484

1,237

6.7

2.9

9.3

Protected well

465,775

38,510

1,098

5.9

14.1

0.3

Rain water

39,916

14,834

59

0.3

0.1

0.5

Protected spring

18,854

1,986

30

0.2

0.2

0.1

Tanker supply/Vendor provided

100,048

2,325

34

0.2

0.0

0.3

Unprotected well

152,055

38,472

490

2.6

3.1

2.3

Unprotected spring

15,738

2,942

387

2.1

0.3

3.3

River/Stream

588,590

100,918

7,110

38.3

23.6

48.4

Dugout/Pond/Lake/Dam/Canal

96,422

27,098

1,270

6.8

0.3

11.4

Other

10,302

1,275

83

0.4

0.3

0.6

 


 Bathing and Toilet Facilities

An efficient and hygienic method of human waste disposal available in a dwelling unit is a critical indicator of the sanitary condition of the unit and is an indirect measure of the socio-economic status of a household. Table 8.11 shows that five main types of toilet facilities were reported in the 2010 PHC. The highest reported toilet facilities (or lack of it) used in the District are pit latrine 5,734 (30.9%), no toilet facility, 5,091 (27.4%), public toilet 4,837 (26.0%), Kumasi Ventilated Improved Pit Latrine (KVIP) is 2,301 (10.9%) and water closet, 721 (3.9%).

Households who practice no facility (bush, beach, and field) are more in the rural areas (35.0%). Also, households using WC are more in the urban areas constituting 8.1 percent whilst only 1.0 percent uses WC in the rural areas.

Regarding bathing facilities, a higher proportion of households (6,341) constituting 34.1 percent in the District have their own bathrooms for exclusive use. Out of the total rural households, (39.2%) and 26.7percent 68.1 percent in urban areas have own bathrooms for exclusive use. Again, 3,816 households representing 20.5 percent use shared open cubicle with (29.1. %) of the urban households and 14.6 percent of rural households practicing the same system


 Bathing facility and toilet facilities used by household

Total country

Region

District

Toilet facility/Bathing facility

Total

Number

Percent

Urban

Rural

Toilet facility used by household

Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

No facilities (bush/beach/field)

1,056,382

137,522

5,091

27.4

16.3

35.0

W.C.

839,611

29,799

721

3.9

8.1

1.0

Pit latrine

1,040,883

112,196

5,734

30.9

26.1

34.2

KVIP

572,824

63,237

2,031

10.9

14.9

8.2

Bucket/Pan

40,678

2,393

34

0.2

0.2

0.1

Public toilet (WC/KVIP/Pit/Pan etc)

1,893,291

148,740

4,837

26.0

33.0

21.2

Other

23,385

1,713

129

0.7

1.3

0.3

Bathing facility used by household

Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

Own bathroom for exclusive use

1,535,392

168,731

6,341

34.1

26.7

39.2

Shared separate bathroom in the same house

1,818,522

111,402

3,590

19.3

25.5

15.1

Private open cubicle

381,979

49,908

1,456

7.8

4.9

9.9

Shared open cubicle

1,000,257

98,801

3,816

20.5

29.1

14.6

Public bath house

140,501

3,408

67

0.4

0.6

0.2

Bathroom in another house

187,337

19,847

907

4.9

3.7

5.7

Open space around house

372,556

39,498

2,123

11.4

8.4

13.5

River/Pond/Lake/Dam

14,234

1,281

120

0.6

0.5

0.8

Other

16,276

2,724

157

0.8

0.7

0.9

 


 Method of Waste Disposal

One of most intractable challenges of both urban and rural areas in Ghana is adopting modern and hygienic solid and liquid waste disposal systems. Acceptable waste management helps to prevent the spread of some types of infections and improves the quality of the environment.

As indicated in Table 8.12, a higher proportion of households 6,419 representing 34.6 use public dumps (open space) as their main source of refuse disposal. Out of the total rural households, 30.0 percent use public dumps (open space) as compared to 41.1 percent of the urban households. The next major form of solid waste disposal in the District is by burning by households where 5,250 (28.3%) households burn their solid waste.

In terms of liquid waste disposal, 12,232 (65.8%) of households dispose liquid waste indiscriminately by throwing onto compounds. Out of the total urban households, majority (55.3%) dispose liquid waste on compounds as compared to 73.1 percent in rural areas. There are only 173 (0.9%) households in the District who dispose their liquid waste through the sewerage system. Only 1.9 percent of households in urban areas and 0.3 percent of rural households dispose liquid waste through a sewerage system 18.5 percent in rural areas


 Method of rubbish and liquid waste disposal by households

Method of waste disposal

Total country

Region

District

Total

Urban

Rural

Number

Percent

Method of rubbish disposal by household

Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

Collected

785,889

30,430

1,407

7.6

4.8

9.5

Burned by household

584,820

78,604

5,250

28.3

31.2

26.2

Public dump (container)

1,299,654

82,361

1,332

7.2

13.6

2.7

Public dump (open space)

2,061,403

204,656

6,419

34.6

41.1

30.0

Dumped indiscriminately

498,868

67,801

3,151

17.0

5.2

25.1

Buried by household

182,615

26,014

752

4.0

2.7

5.0

Other

53,805

5,734

266

1.4

1.3

1.5

Method of liquid waste disposal by household

Total

5,467,054

495,600

18,577

100.0

100.0

100.0

Through the sewerage system

183,169

4,906

173

0.9

1.9

0.3

Through drainage system into a gutter

594,404

12,540

332

1.8

3.9

0.4

Through drainage into a pit (soak away)

167,555

11,493

375

2.0

3.2

1.2

Thrown onto the street/outside

1,538,550

154,009

4,253

22.9

24.2

22.0

Thrown into gutter

1,020,096

46,100

828

4.5

7.9

2.1

Thrown onto compound

1,924,986

258,942

12,232

65.8

55.3

73.1

Other

38,294

7,610

384

2.1

3.5

1.1

 


Date Created : 11/24/2017 4:34:29 AM